Trust Litigation and Probate Estate Litigation - Its Common Causes
Mixing family members and money does not always lead to love and happiness, as the current economic environment has provided way too many examples. While the work we do is frequently challenging and often rewarding, protecting our clients, our colleagues and ourselves from unnecessary litigation remains a high priority. In many cases, litigation can be avoided with some basic precautionary measures, and solid estate planning procedures. When those measures are missing, all too often probate litigation or trust litigation is the ultimate result.
This entry explores some of the most common reasons trusts and Florida probate estates end up in litigation, and some measures the estate planning team can take to help prevent unnecessary probate and trust litigation.
When probate or trust litigation ensues regarding an estate plan, it can take two forms. It may be a challenge to an estate plan document, such as whether a last will and testament should be admitted to probate. It may also have to do with the administration of an estate, such as who will serve as personal representative (executor).
Challenges to the Plan
Challenges to estate planning documents frequently occur when children (and sometimes spouses) are not treated equally as beneficiaries, and especially if someone feels they were not treated "fairly" (a very subjective determination) the the deceased person's will or revocable living trust. It is not necessary for someone to be totally disinherited for trust or probate litigation to ensue.
Lack of Capacity
That a trustmaker or testator (will maker) lacked the mental capacity to make a last will and testament or create a revocable living trust is a common complaint.
Definitions of capacity vary from state to state but, generally speaking, the testator needs to have the ability to understand at the time of making his or her last will, or revocable living trust, generally what assets he or she owns, the dispositive provisions of the last will, and the testator's relationship with those who will benefit from the last will or living trust.
Every adult who has not been judicially determined incapacitated is presumed to have capacity. Therefore, the burden to prove incapacity is on the contestant. Mere feebleness of the body or mental weakness does not rebut the presumption of competence. Also, the moment at which testamentary capacity is to be tested is the moment of the execution of the estate planning document.
Because of these assumptions and requirements, voiding a last will or revocable living trust on the grounds of testamentary capacity is difficult. However, the prudent course is to take steps to protect yourself and your client as much as possible from this kind of will contest or challenge to a revocable trust.
Fraud, Duress and Undue Influence
Fraud, duress and undue influence commonly shortened to simply "undue influence," is statistically the most frequent basis for blocking probate of a last will or enforcement of a revocable trust. It can also result in partial invalidity if the remainder of the estate planning document is not invalid for other reasons. Simply stated, it is the substitution of another person's will for that of the testator or trustmaker.
A frequent scenario in such cases is this: A family member or caretaker brings in an elderly client, stays with the client during the estate planning meeting, may even pay for the attorney's fees or other professional's services, and becomes the main beneficiary or heir of the last will or revocable trust. The beneficiary may or may not be related to the client.
When a probate court makes a determination of whether undue influence has been exercised, it considers a variety of factors, including whether the transaction took place at an appropriate time and in an appropriate setting, and whether the testator was pressured into acting quickly or discouraged from seeking advice from others. Probate courts also consider the relationship between the parties and the "fairness" of the transaction.
Revocation of a Will
A third common attack is that the estate planning document at issue has been revoked. A testator may completely revoke a last will or revocable trust by intentionally destroying it. Complete or partial revocation may also be done by a writing executed under the same formalities of a will or trust or executing a new will or revocable trust.
There is a presumption that a last will was revoked if it was in the possession of the testator and cannot be located upon his/her death. The burden is on the proponent of the last will to establish otherwise.
Partial revocation may be desirable, especially in cases of undue influence when only certain provisions of the last will might be affected by the person(s) who stand to benefit from the undue influence, and other provisions pertaining to innocent beneficiaries are unaffected.
Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements
These, if valid, can affect the surviving spouse's elective share or intestate share of a probate estate or trust estate, rights to exempt Florida homestead, exempt property, family allowance and preference on appointment as personal representative of an intestate estate. Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements are often challenged when a marriage ends by death or divorce.
Matters Affecting Probate Administration or Trust Administration
Creditors' Claims
Litigated matters in a probate estate may relate to creditors' claims. Some of the grounds include that the claim against the probate estate may be challenged as not valid or coming too late. So, too, an objection to a claim filed in the probate estate may be challenged as coming too late.
Removal of Personal Representative
Again, there will be variations in state probate laws but, in general, a personal representative may be removed for various causes, which may include:
• physical or mental incapacity;
• failure to comply with a probate court order;
• failure to account for sale or real property or to produce the probate estate assets for inspection;
• wasting or other maladministration of the probate estate;
• failure to give bond or security;
• conviction of a felony;
• conflicting or adverse interests against the probate estate;
• revocation of probate of a will in which he/she is named as personal representative;
• lack of present ability to qualify for appointment.
Simple disagreement between beneficiaries and the personal representative is not likely to support removal.
Removal of Trustee
The general rule is a probate court can remove a trustee of a trust only for incapacity or on a clear showing of abuse or wrongdoing in the actual administration of the trust. It is not enough to show that there is a potential for mismanagement or conflict of interest by the trustee; the party seeking removal must allege and prove actual conduct by the trustee amounting to a breach of trust. However, the court should allow for removal for unfitness when the likelihood of harm to the trust can be demonstrated, such as from habitual substance abuse or lack of ability.
Where there is hostility and disharmony between co-trustees that impedes administration of the trust and unnecessarily depletes the trust's assets, a court can remove the trustee determined to be the cause of the disharmony.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A trustee, whether a professional or a family member, has certain fiduciary responsibilities and a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries of the estate under the law, including:
• To follow the instructions in the trust document.
• To not mix trust assets with his/her own. Bank accounts and investments must be kept separate.
• To not use trust assets for his/her own benefit.
• The trustee or executor must treat all beneficiaries the same. One beneficiary cannot be favored over another unless the will or trust says otherwise.
• To invest trust or estate assets in a prudent (conservative) manner, in a way that will result in reasonable growth with minimum risk.
• To keep accurate records, file tax returns, and report to the beneficiaries as the law or the trust requires.
Avoiding Litigation
Exploring probate litigation and trust litigation risks and how to minimize them creates an excellent opportunity to suggest and put together a qualified team of advisors who can ensure proper trust administration. However, even professionals are at risk when helping administer a trust for the beneficiaries. Here are some areas of concern:
Understanding the Terms of the Trust
The risk of probate or trust litigation may be reduced by making sure all parties to the trust understand what the trust says: who will receive distributions from the trust, how much they will receive and when they will receive it; the fact that debts and taxes will need to be paid, how much they will be, and when they must be paid; who the trustee(s) and successor trustee(s) are, their responsibilities, and how they are to be compensated; what services from professionals will be secured and how they will be compensated; etc.
Administrative Issues of an Established Trust
At the incapacity or death of the grantor (trustmaker) of the trust, there are many administrative tasks, issues and decisions to face. Frequently, the grantor's accounting records are not up to date, especially if the person was ill or losing mental capacity. Bills may be past due and tax returns may not have been filed. The trustee may need to be brought up to speed quickly and, if a family member, may not be emotionally ready to do so.
If the grantor has died, there may be several trusts with their own administrative needs depending on the family and financial situation. For example, there may be blended families; younger and older children; irrevocable trusts for tax planning; charitable planning; provisions for a surviving spouse; IRAs, 401(k)s, and annuities; life insurance; etc. Also, a well-intentioned but uninformed or unsuitable trustee may make costly mistakes without careful oversight and instruction by a professional who understands the required accounting.
Distribution Standards and Decisions
When drafting a trust that will give the trustee discretion in providing for a beneficiary, the estate planner will often use the accepted standards of "health, education, maintenance and support." Generally these are interpreted to mean that a beneficiary can receive distributions that will maintain his or her accustomed standard of living. But does that mean providing unlimited funds to maintain that standard of living at the risk of depleting the trust assets? If the beneficiary is receiving income from other sources, should that income be taken into consideration? If the trust does not provide more explicit instructions, the trustee can be put in an awkward situation, pitted between the beneficiary who is to receive the support and other beneficiaries who are expecting to receive the trust assets after the supported beneficiary dies.
Balancing the Interests of Income Beneficiaries vs. Remainder Beneficiaries
Many ongoing trusts give one beneficiary (typically, a surviving spouse) the right to receive all of the income from the trust. After this beneficiary dies, another beneficiary (often an adult child or children) will be entitled to receive the trust principal. This can frequently lead to conflicts between the income beneficiary, who wants as much income as possible, and the remainder beneficiary, who wants the principal to grow as much as possible. The trustee and the investment advisor will need to work together carefully to create as much balance as possible to provide for both.
Suitability of Investments
Each beneficiary of the trust may have different risk tolerance levels. Some may want to be more aggressive, others more cautious. Some may want the trust to invest in their business or buy them a house. Remember, the trustee, working with the investment advisor, is responsible for handling the trust assets in a prudent (conservative) manner for the benefit of all beneficiaries, not just one particular beneficiary.
Insurance Reviews
Regular reviews of the amount of life insurance and policies are a must. The amount of insurance may need to be adjusted up or down. If the individual is in good health, a different policy may be more suitable. Should irrevocable life insurance trusts own the policies? Is there a desire to establish trusts for grandchildren, charitable causes, or a special needs child? There are many valuable uses for life insurance in estate planning and, if done properly, the proceeds will be free of estate taxes, income taxes, and probate fees.
Conclusion
Not all trust and estate litigation can be avoided or is, in fact, bad. There are times when it is necessary to protect the innocent or wronged. What every professional should do is to protect their clients from unnecessary and avoidable litigation, and there are steps you can take to do that. All members of the advisory team need to be familiar with and understand legal issues that may arise in probate administration and trust administration. Estate planning professionals should not assume the family has any correct information about either of these subjects. Estate planning clients should expect their estate planning professionals to act in a professional, ethical and conscientious manner. The client should also expect that his estate planning professionals will communicate often and well to all involved.
This entry explores some of the most common reasons trusts and Florida probate estates end up in litigation, and some measures the estate planning team can take to help prevent unnecessary probate and trust litigation.
When probate or trust litigation ensues regarding an estate plan, it can take two forms. It may be a challenge to an estate plan document, such as whether a last will and testament should be admitted to probate. It may also have to do with the administration of an estate, such as who will serve as personal representative (executor).
Challenges to the Plan
Challenges to estate planning documents frequently occur when children (and sometimes spouses) are not treated equally as beneficiaries, and especially if someone feels they were not treated "fairly" (a very subjective determination) the the deceased person's will or revocable living trust. It is not necessary for someone to be totally disinherited for trust or probate litigation to ensue.
Lack of Capacity
That a trustmaker or testator (will maker) lacked the mental capacity to make a last will and testament or create a revocable living trust is a common complaint.
Definitions of capacity vary from state to state but, generally speaking, the testator needs to have the ability to understand at the time of making his or her last will, or revocable living trust, generally what assets he or she owns, the dispositive provisions of the last will, and the testator's relationship with those who will benefit from the last will or living trust.
Every adult who has not been judicially determined incapacitated is presumed to have capacity. Therefore, the burden to prove incapacity is on the contestant. Mere feebleness of the body or mental weakness does not rebut the presumption of competence. Also, the moment at which testamentary capacity is to be tested is the moment of the execution of the estate planning document.
Because of these assumptions and requirements, voiding a last will or revocable living trust on the grounds of testamentary capacity is difficult. However, the prudent course is to take steps to protect yourself and your client as much as possible from this kind of will contest or challenge to a revocable trust.
Fraud, Duress and Undue Influence
Fraud, duress and undue influence commonly shortened to simply "undue influence," is statistically the most frequent basis for blocking probate of a last will or enforcement of a revocable trust. It can also result in partial invalidity if the remainder of the estate planning document is not invalid for other reasons. Simply stated, it is the substitution of another person's will for that of the testator or trustmaker.
A frequent scenario in such cases is this: A family member or caretaker brings in an elderly client, stays with the client during the estate planning meeting, may even pay for the attorney's fees or other professional's services, and becomes the main beneficiary or heir of the last will or revocable trust. The beneficiary may or may not be related to the client.
When a probate court makes a determination of whether undue influence has been exercised, it considers a variety of factors, including whether the transaction took place at an appropriate time and in an appropriate setting, and whether the testator was pressured into acting quickly or discouraged from seeking advice from others. Probate courts also consider the relationship between the parties and the "fairness" of the transaction.
Revocation of a Will
A third common attack is that the estate planning document at issue has been revoked. A testator may completely revoke a last will or revocable trust by intentionally destroying it. Complete or partial revocation may also be done by a writing executed under the same formalities of a will or trust or executing a new will or revocable trust.
There is a presumption that a last will was revoked if it was in the possession of the testator and cannot be located upon his/her death. The burden is on the proponent of the last will to establish otherwise.
Partial revocation may be desirable, especially in cases of undue influence when only certain provisions of the last will might be affected by the person(s) who stand to benefit from the undue influence, and other provisions pertaining to innocent beneficiaries are unaffected.
Prenuptial and Postnuptial Agreements
These, if valid, can affect the surviving spouse's elective share or intestate share of a probate estate or trust estate, rights to exempt Florida homestead, exempt property, family allowance and preference on appointment as personal representative of an intestate estate. Prenuptial and postnuptial agreements are often challenged when a marriage ends by death or divorce.
Matters Affecting Probate Administration or Trust Administration
Creditors' Claims
Litigated matters in a probate estate may relate to creditors' claims. Some of the grounds include that the claim against the probate estate may be challenged as not valid or coming too late. So, too, an objection to a claim filed in the probate estate may be challenged as coming too late.
Removal of Personal Representative
Again, there will be variations in state probate laws but, in general, a personal representative may be removed for various causes, which may include:
• physical or mental incapacity;
• failure to comply with a probate court order;
• failure to account for sale or real property or to produce the probate estate assets for inspection;
• wasting or other maladministration of the probate estate;
• failure to give bond or security;
• conviction of a felony;
• conflicting or adverse interests against the probate estate;
• revocation of probate of a will in which he/she is named as personal representative;
• lack of present ability to qualify for appointment.
Simple disagreement between beneficiaries and the personal representative is not likely to support removal.
Removal of Trustee
The general rule is a probate court can remove a trustee of a trust only for incapacity or on a clear showing of abuse or wrongdoing in the actual administration of the trust. It is not enough to show that there is a potential for mismanagement or conflict of interest by the trustee; the party seeking removal must allege and prove actual conduct by the trustee amounting to a breach of trust. However, the court should allow for removal for unfitness when the likelihood of harm to the trust can be demonstrated, such as from habitual substance abuse or lack of ability.
Where there is hostility and disharmony between co-trustees that impedes administration of the trust and unnecessarily depletes the trust's assets, a court can remove the trustee determined to be the cause of the disharmony.
Breach of Fiduciary Duty
A trustee, whether a professional or a family member, has certain fiduciary responsibilities and a fiduciary duty to the beneficiaries of the estate under the law, including:
• To follow the instructions in the trust document.
• To not mix trust assets with his/her own. Bank accounts and investments must be kept separate.
• To not use trust assets for his/her own benefit.
• The trustee or executor must treat all beneficiaries the same. One beneficiary cannot be favored over another unless the will or trust says otherwise.
• To invest trust or estate assets in a prudent (conservative) manner, in a way that will result in reasonable growth with minimum risk.
• To keep accurate records, file tax returns, and report to the beneficiaries as the law or the trust requires.
Avoiding Litigation
Exploring probate litigation and trust litigation risks and how to minimize them creates an excellent opportunity to suggest and put together a qualified team of advisors who can ensure proper trust administration. However, even professionals are at risk when helping administer a trust for the beneficiaries. Here are some areas of concern:
Understanding the Terms of the Trust
The risk of probate or trust litigation may be reduced by making sure all parties to the trust understand what the trust says: who will receive distributions from the trust, how much they will receive and when they will receive it; the fact that debts and taxes will need to be paid, how much they will be, and when they must be paid; who the trustee(s) and successor trustee(s) are, their responsibilities, and how they are to be compensated; what services from professionals will be secured and how they will be compensated; etc.
Administrative Issues of an Established Trust
At the incapacity or death of the grantor (trustmaker) of the trust, there are many administrative tasks, issues and decisions to face. Frequently, the grantor's accounting records are not up to date, especially if the person was ill or losing mental capacity. Bills may be past due and tax returns may not have been filed. The trustee may need to be brought up to speed quickly and, if a family member, may not be emotionally ready to do so.
If the grantor has died, there may be several trusts with their own administrative needs depending on the family and financial situation. For example, there may be blended families; younger and older children; irrevocable trusts for tax planning; charitable planning; provisions for a surviving spouse; IRAs, 401(k)s, and annuities; life insurance; etc. Also, a well-intentioned but uninformed or unsuitable trustee may make costly mistakes without careful oversight and instruction by a professional who understands the required accounting.
Distribution Standards and Decisions
When drafting a trust that will give the trustee discretion in providing for a beneficiary, the estate planner will often use the accepted standards of "health, education, maintenance and support." Generally these are interpreted to mean that a beneficiary can receive distributions that will maintain his or her accustomed standard of living. But does that mean providing unlimited funds to maintain that standard of living at the risk of depleting the trust assets? If the beneficiary is receiving income from other sources, should that income be taken into consideration? If the trust does not provide more explicit instructions, the trustee can be put in an awkward situation, pitted between the beneficiary who is to receive the support and other beneficiaries who are expecting to receive the trust assets after the supported beneficiary dies.
Balancing the Interests of Income Beneficiaries vs. Remainder Beneficiaries
Many ongoing trusts give one beneficiary (typically, a surviving spouse) the right to receive all of the income from the trust. After this beneficiary dies, another beneficiary (often an adult child or children) will be entitled to receive the trust principal. This can frequently lead to conflicts between the income beneficiary, who wants as much income as possible, and the remainder beneficiary, who wants the principal to grow as much as possible. The trustee and the investment advisor will need to work together carefully to create as much balance as possible to provide for both.
Suitability of Investments
Each beneficiary of the trust may have different risk tolerance levels. Some may want to be more aggressive, others more cautious. Some may want the trust to invest in their business or buy them a house. Remember, the trustee, working with the investment advisor, is responsible for handling the trust assets in a prudent (conservative) manner for the benefit of all beneficiaries, not just one particular beneficiary.
Insurance Reviews
Regular reviews of the amount of life insurance and policies are a must. The amount of insurance may need to be adjusted up or down. If the individual is in good health, a different policy may be more suitable. Should irrevocable life insurance trusts own the policies? Is there a desire to establish trusts for grandchildren, charitable causes, or a special needs child? There are many valuable uses for life insurance in estate planning and, if done properly, the proceeds will be free of estate taxes, income taxes, and probate fees.
Conclusion
Not all trust and estate litigation can be avoided or is, in fact, bad. There are times when it is necessary to protect the innocent or wronged. What every professional should do is to protect their clients from unnecessary and avoidable litigation, and there are steps you can take to do that. All members of the advisory team need to be familiar with and understand legal issues that may arise in probate administration and trust administration. Estate planning professionals should not assume the family has any correct information about either of these subjects. Estate planning clients should expect their estate planning professionals to act in a professional, ethical and conscientious manner. The client should also expect that his estate planning professionals will communicate often and well to all involved.
Posted by Randy Coleman at 6/4/2010 11:17 AM 
Categories: Estate Litigation, Estate Planning, Trust Administration, Probate Litigation, Trust Litigation, Will Contests, Probate, Wills and Probate
Tags: trust litigation probate a will in Florida probate will probate trust probate estate estate planning estates and trusts Jacksonville probate attorney probate administration trust administration
Categories: Estate Litigation, Estate Planning, Trust Administration, Probate Litigation, Trust Litigation, Will Contests, Probate, Wills and Probate
Tags: trust litigation probate a will in Florida probate will probate trust probate estate estate planning estates and trusts Jacksonville probate attorney probate administration trust administration
Trackbacks
-
7/23/2010 4:05 AM
Pet Wills, Trusts and After Care wrote:
+related+blog
Comments